The Superpave Shear Tester (SST) Figure 96) is used to characterize a HMA mixture’s resistance to permanent deformation (rut resistance). This characterization can be used as a performance test for HMA mixtures designed using Superpave mix design or other mix design procedures. The SST machine can perform several different tests to characterized HMA samples.
The most common SST tests, the repeated shear at constant height (RSCH) and the frequency sweep at constant height (FSCH) tests subject a short HMA cylinder to repeated shear in a pulse manner (RSCH) or a range of loading frequencies (FSCH) in a controlled atmosphere. Results from the RSCH test are used to determine the accumulation of permanent shear strain with load repetitions. Results from the FSCH test are used to determine the sample’s complex shear modulus (G*) and phase angle (φ). These characteristics can then be used to predict a HMA mixture’s permanent deformation potential. Because of the testing equipment complexity and cost, the SST is primarily research equipment and is not a standard test in Superpave mix design or quality assurance testing.
The standard SST procedures are found in:
Most rutting in HMA pavements is due to shear deformation of the HMA layer so long as air void content (Va) is below about 9 percent (Monismith, 2004[1]). Further, these shear deformations are usually limited to the upper portion of the HMA layer (Figure 2). Therefore, a laboratory test that measures shear deformation in the upper HMA layer (3 to 4 inches (75 to 100 mm) typically) seems to be an effective way to define the propensity of a HMA mixture to rut.
The Superpave Shear Tester (SST) was developed as part of SHRP research to be one of the HMA mixture performance testers for Superpave mix design. Although it is quite versatile and reasonably able to predict HMA pavement permanent deformation, it has not been widely adopted because of its complexity and cost. It is, however, a valuable HMA research tool and is also being used, where feasible, to conduct performance tests for mixture design (Monismith, 2004[1]).
The SST, as developed by SHRP research, can perform the following four tests related to HMA performance:
Currently, the first three tests are described in AASHTO T 320, with the most popular being the RSCH and the FSCH. The RSCSR can also be used but is generally not performed as widely as the other three tests.
The RSCH test is a test that repeatedly loads a HMA sample in shear and measures cumulative permanent deformation as a function of the number of load cycles (Figure 3). The test is typically conducted without a confining pressure (called an “unconfined” test). A typical test might plot something like Figure 4.
The cumulative permanent shear strain of a measured sample can be divided into two major zones (Figure 5):
Typically, the 5,000 cycles used in the RSCH test are enough to develop the secondary portion of the curve so that its slope can be determined. This type of test is similar to the flow number tests for the SPT except that there is not tertiary zone since it is an artifact of the triaxially loaded sample in the SPT.
NCHRP Project 9-19 reports that while the resilient strain and the resilient modulus from this test gave fair correlations with rut depth in the field, the shear strain at 3,000 load cycles provided the best correlation with field rut depth.
The FSCH test is a shear dynamic modulus test that measures a sample’s stress-strain relationship under a continuous sinusoidal shear loading at a constant shear strain. It measures peak stress and strain values and the time lag between them (Figure 6). The test is conducted without a confining pressure (called an “unconfined” test). A typical series of tests might plot something like Figure 7.
For linear viscoelastic materials (stress-strain ratio is independent of the loading stress applied) such as HMA, the relationship between applied shear stress and resulting shear strain is defined by a complex number called the “complex shear modulus” (G*) (Witczak et al., 2002[2]) as seen in the equations below:
Where:
These equations are the same as those discussed in the SPT section for complex modulus although traditionally the term E* is replace by G* to denote shear dynamic modulus and σo and εo are replaced by τ0 and γ0 to denote shear stress and axial strain respectively.
As seen from the above equations, the shear complex modulus, G*, is actually the summation of two components: (1) the shear storage modulus component and (2) the shear loss or viscous modulus. Therefore, it can be an indicator of the viscous properties of the material being evaluated, which can be related to HMA permanent deformation.
NCHRP Project 9-19 reports that the |G*| parameter seems to correlate reasonably well with rut depth as measured in the field. In theory, the |G*|/sinφ parameter should work better based on the same reasoning of the SPT dynamic modulus test. However, in practice it does not predict permanent deformation any better than |G*| alone (Witczak et al., 2002[2]). HMA using modified binders can sometimes give results where stiffness as measured by |G*| is not necessarily related to performance.
The SSCH test is a shear creep test that measures a sample’s maximum shear strain that occurs during the test and the permanent shear strain at the end of the test (Figure 8). The test is conducted without a confining pressure (called an “unconfined” test).
This test can be used to estimate a HMA mixture’s susceptibility to permanent deformation because it measures the sample’s ability to resist shear strain (Bennett et al., 2004[3]). At high test temperatures (e.g. 104°F (40°C), lower creep strains indicate an ability to resist permanent deformation, while at low test temperatures (e.g. 39 °F (4°C)), higher creep strains indicate an ability to flex and relieve stresses rather than crack (Bennett et al., 2004[3]).
In theory, creep tests tend to under predict permanent deformation because as they progress the aggregate within the HMA sample tends to unlock from a tight formation, then most likely reorient and lock up again under the constant creep load. This secondary locking tends to resist further deformation. In the field, however, the repetitive nature of the wheel loads traversing the HMA pavement subjects the HMA to a number of loads in succession rather than one continuous load. This type of cyclic loading does not permit aggregate locking to occur (Sousa et al., 1994[4]).
The RSCRS test repeatedly loads a HMA sample in shear such that the ratio of shear load to axial load is constant throughout the test. As with the RSCH, the test measures cumulative permanent deformation as a function of the number of load cycles. The RSCSR test is a test used to evaluate the potential of a HMA mixture to rut. Extreme instability is indicated by a rapidly increasing permanent shear strain with additional load cycles (Figure 9). The test is conducted without a confining pressure (called an “unconfined” test).
When using the SST or interpreting results from SST tests, several basic concepts should be understood.
All three of the currently used SST tests (FSCH, RSCH and SSCH) actively maintain the HMA sample at constant height throughout the testing. This is done by a LVDT that measures height and then feeds this information back to the SST vertical actuators, which then generally act to compress the sample in order to maintain a constant height.
The constant height requirement is a reflection of the need to simulate the interaction of shear and volumetric strains within the HMA sample. An induced shear strain causes the aggregate particles within HMA to roll past one another in an attempt to accommodate the strain through deformation. If unconfined, the HMA actually expands as the aggregate particles roll from a tight formation to a more loose formation (Figure 10). This phenomenon is often referred to as “shear dilatency” (Sousa et al., 1994[4]). In the field, however, the HMA within a pavement is substantially confined by the HMA around it. This confinement works to resist expansion, which prevents aggregate movement. This, in turn, provides an increase in shear stiffness that reduces permanent deformation. Therefore, unless a test is able to simulate this confining effect, it may overestimate permanent deformation. The SST simulates this confining effect by maintaining the test sample at a constant height. The tenancy for the aggregate particles to roll past one another and increase the sample volume is counteracted by the SST vertical actuators that confine the sample vertically based on the LVDT-measured amount of vertical strain.
The SST tests are sensitive to sample compaction method. Samples compacted with the SGC (the standard method) tend to exhibit greater resistance to permanent deformation than cores extracted from the field or samples compacted with the rolling wheel compactor (Figure 97). Figure 98 shows that rolling wheel compacted samples show about the same resistance to permanent deformation as field cores. This is why some researchers advocate the use of the rolling wheel compactor when making SST and other HMA test samples.
As with many HMA tests, the SST tests are sensitive to sample air void content (Va). For a given mix in the RSCH test, the number of repetitions to 5 percent permanent shear strain is a function of its air-void content, increasing as the air-void content is decreased to a value between 3 and 2 percent (Figure 13). Below an air-void content of about 2 percent, with further decrease in air-void content, the number of repetitions again decreases.
Sample size needs to be large enough such that measurements reflect global material characteristics rather than characteristics of individual constituents such as aggregate particles. The sample dimensions that achieve this are referred to as the representative volume element (RVE), defined as the smallest volume large enough so that the global characteristics of the material remain constant, regardless of the location of the RVE (Monismith, 2004). Sample sizes smaller than the RVE produce much variability and can show bias so they may not be statistically meaningful. Results of typical SST tests show these signs, indicating samples smaller than the RVE (Weissman et al., 1999[5] and Harvey and Long, 1999[6]).
The following is a brief summary of the three main SST tests: RSCH, FSCH and SSCH. It is not a complete procedure and should not be used to perform the test. The complete test procedure for all three main SST tests can be found in:
A sample that is typically 6 inches (150 mm) in diameter and 2 inches (50 mm) or 1.5 inches (38 mm) tall is glued between two platens and inserted into the SST. The platens are attached to the SST hydraulic actuators and moved side-to-side in the SST to induce a shear stress within the HMA sample. The manner of this side-to-side movement is determined by the type of test run. The RSCH uses a cyclic movement that creates 10 psi (69 kPa) of shear stress for 0.1 seconds followed by a 0.6 second rest period. The FSCH uses a sinusoidal movement that creates a 0.01 percent shear strain for a given number of cycles at specified cycle frequencies. The SSCH applies a single shear stress of a given amount over a short duration (dependent upon the test temperature). Each of these three tests maintains the HMA sample at constant height by using axial LVDTs to measure sample height and adjust the SST vertical actuators accordingly. Figure 99 shows an sample in the SST with LVDTs attached.
It takes about 1 week for sample preparation and testing in the SST. About 2 days of this is actual time in the SST.
Basic Procedure
The basic procedure is described in three sections: sample preparation, preparing sample for testing and testing. The testing section is broken up into the three common SST tests: RSST-CH, FSCH and simple shear.
Sample Preparation
The SST can be used to perform tests on 3 types of samples. Testing samples are typically 6 inches (150 mm) in diameter by either 2 inches (50 mm) tall (for 0.75 inch (19.0 mm) NMAS) or 1.5 inches (38 mm) tall (for small er NMAS) (Figure 100).
Samples with NMAS larger than 0.75 inches (19.0 mm) can be tested in the SST but the larger aggregate size may significantly interfere with material response and affect the repeatability of the test (AASHTO, 2000c).
The SST can only test samples of 6 inches (150 mm) in diameter. A sample height of 2 inches (50 mm) is preferred, however pavement layers in the field are often thinner than this so sample heights of 1.5 inches (38 mm) are allowed. Equipment constraints prevent the testing of thinner samples (AASHTO, 2000c).
Laboratory-Mixed, Laboratory-Compacted Samples (LMLC)
Other compaction equipment, procedures and target air void content (Va) can be used. However, SST test results are sensitive to these parameters and comparison between test results using different compaction equipment, procedures and air void content (Va) should not be made (AASHTO, 2000c).
Voids are not evenly distributed through out a compacted sample; there are usually fewer air voids near the center of the sample. When the samples are cut to the proper height in step 4, the resulting air void content (Va) may be substantially lower since the top and bottom of the compacted sample are cut off.Therefore, a sample cut to the correct height can often have an air air void content (Va) on the order of 1 to 2 percent lower than the uncut compacted sample.
Because of this, samples are often compacted to a air void content (Va) slightly higher than that desired for testing. Usually a air void content (Va) 1.0 percent higher than desired is sufficient (AASHTO, 2000c).
Field-Mixed, Laboratory-Compacted Samples (FMLC)
It takes about 135 g of epoxy cement to glue the sample to the platens (AASHTO, 2000c).
This temperature depends upon the test being conducted but is typically (AASHTO, 2000c):
Stabilization times significantly less than 60 minutes may be insufficient to allow the sample to reacquire the test temperature after having been subjected to preconditioning and instrumentation. A stabilization time of 60 minutes is recommended (Anderson and McGennis, 1998).
Repeated Shear Test at Constant Height (RSCH)
Shear Frequency Sweep Test at Constant Height (FSCH)
Table 13: FSCH Testing Frequencies and Number of Cycles
Frequency | Number of Cycles |
---|---|
0.01 | 4 |
0.02 | 4 |
0.05 | 4 |
0.1 | 7 |
0.2 | 7 |
0.5 | 7 |
1 | 20 |
2 | 20 |
5 | 50 |
10 | 50 |
Simple Shear Test at Constant Height (SSCH)
Table 14: Shear Stress Level for Given Test Temperatures
Frequency | Number of Cycles |
---|---|
39°F (4°C) | 50 psi (345kPa) |
104°F (40°C) | 5 psi (35kPa) |
68°F (20°C) | 15 psi (105kPa) |
The SST can measure many parameters but the most typical are: permanent shear strain, shear dynamic modulus (|G*|), phase angle (φ), maximum shear strain and recovery.
Superpave mix design does not specify limits on SST-measured properties. Some larger agencies and research centers with SST testing experience may have recommended limits for certain HMA mixtures and traffic loading scenarios. The basic procedure for determining shear strain criteria for the RSCH test is:
Where:
For the reconstruction of Interstate 710 in Long Beach, CA, this procedure resulted in the choice of 660,000 shear repetitions with a not-to-exceed plastic strain value of 5 percent.
Shear dynamic modulus (G*) values depend upon test temperature, frequency and the HMA composition. For a PG 64-22, typical values for 0.01 Hz test frequency can range from about 1,000 psi (6.9 MPa) to 100,000 psi (690 MPa), while typical values for 10 Hz test frequency can range from about 100,000 psi (690 MPa) to near 1,000,000 psi (6900 MPa) (Bennert et al., 2003[7]).
Typical phase angles can be from 10 to 60 degrees depending upon loading frequency, loading temperature, aggregate type, asphalt binder type, modifiers and HMA age (Figure 18).
The permanent shear strain is calculated as follows:
Where:
Several calculations are done to determine shear dynamic modulus. These calculations are very similar to those done for the SPT dynamic modulus test. Calculations, which are typically done by software integral to the SST, are as follows:
Where:
Where:
Where:
Where:
Where: